東吳政治系博士班政治思想資格考試參考書單

Andrew Hacker  1961,Political Theory: Philosophy, Ideology , Science.

Charles N. R. McCoy   1963,The Structure of Political Thought: A Study in The History of Political Ideas.

Ernest Barker   1959,The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle.

John H. Hallowell   1950,Main Currents in Modern Political Thought.

John Plamenatz   1963,Man and Society: A Critical Examination of Some Important Social and Political Theories from Machiavelli to Marx, Volume One and Volume Two.

Leo Strauss 1959,What is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies.

                    1953,Natural Right and History.

Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey(eds) 1963,History of Political Philosophy.

Sheldon S. Wolin 1960,Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought.

Buchanan, A., D.Brock, N.Daniels and D. Wikler. 2000. From Chance to Choice.

Dworkin, Ronald. 1976. Taking Rights Seriously.

Fishin, James. 1992. The Dialogue of Justice :Toward A Self-Reflective Society.

Laslett, Peter & James S.Fishin ed. 1992. Justice between Age Groups and Generations.

Mackinnon, Catharine A.Toward a Feminist Theory only words.

Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy,State ,and Utopia.

Nussbaum, C.Martha. 1999. Sex and Social Justice.

Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons.

Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls.

Rawls, A.John. 1971. Theory of Justice.

                        1993. Political Liberalism.

Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality Reexamined.

Shapiro, Ian & Lea Brilmayer. 1999. Global Justice.

Sikora, R.I. and Brian Barry eds. 1978. Obligations to Future Generations.

Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice.

Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference.

 

東吳政治系博士班比較政治學科考試參考書單

Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Almond,Gabriel A. and G. B. Powell, Jr. 2007. Comparative Politics Today: A World View, New York: Pearson/Longman, updated 8th edition, 2007.

Anthony, Downs. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. NewYork: Harper & Row.

David, Mayhew. 2004. Second edition. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dogan, Mattei and Ali Kazancigil (eds). 1994. Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Evans, Peter, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale.

Huntington, Samuel and Nelson. 1976. No Easy Choice. Cambridge: Harvard.

Lane Jan-Erik & Svante Ersson. 1994. Comparative Politics: An Introduction and New Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lichbach, Mark Irving and Alan S. Zuckerman. 1997. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation.

Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

O'Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe Schmitter, 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Peters, Guy B. 1998. Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods. London: MacMillan.

Peters, Guy. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. London and New York: Pinter.

Satoria, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press.

Schedler, Andreas. 1998. "What is Democratic Consolidation?" Journal of Democracy 9:2 (April): 91-107.

Simon Hix, The Political System of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, second edition, 2005.

Skocpol.Theda. 1988. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strom, Karre.1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wiarda, Howard J.(eds) 2002. 3rd edition. New Directions in Comparative Politics. Westview Press.

 

東吳政治學系博士班

國際關係領域資格考試筆試參考書單

97 學年度起適用

1. Dunne, Tim, Kilja Kurki and Steve Smith, eds. (2007) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Wendt, Alexander. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

4. Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye.(2001)Power and Interdependence, 3rd ed. New York: Longman.

5. Baldwin, David A., ed. (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.

6. Bull, Hedley. (2002) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave.

7. Scholte, Jan Aart. (2005) Globalization: A Critical Introduction, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan Press.

8. Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(2007) Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History, 6th ed . New York: Longman.

9. Rosenau, James N. and Mary Durfee. (1995) Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

10. Smith, Steve and et al. eds. (1996) International Theory: Positivism & Beyond. Cambridge University.

 

東吳大學政治學系博士班資格考公共行政暨政策組參考書單

2007.09.02 陳立剛、王輝煌、徐振國、蔡秀涓

備註:1 表陳立剛老師所列 2 表王輝煌老師所列 3.表徐振國老師所列 4 表蔡秀涓老師所列

1. Bernard, C. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. 2

2. Denhardt, Janet Vinzant and Robert B. Denhardt 2007. The New Public Service : Serving, Not Steering. M.E. Sharpe. 1

3. Doninic Wilson and Roopa Purushothaman, 2003 Global Economics Paper No: 99 “Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050” Goldman Sachs https://www.gs.com 3 這是著名的高盛公司九十九號報告書,2003 年發表,隨即影響了全球的思維, 意識到 BRICs 將以極快的速度趕上和超越 G6。全球的企業的佈局和政府高層決 策因而產生急劇調整,以因應新情勢變化。本人因政治經濟的教學,及早注意到 這一篇重要的研究報告。然而要到 2004 年十月,該文之重大影響才傳遞到台灣。 遲來的炒作,被台灣媒體擴大傳譯為「金磚四國」。其後,Next 11 和「新興市場」 的概念陸續出現,展現了全球的新視域。從此一事件,我意識到學術界之理論發 展往往嚴重落後於現象本身之發展。我們必須鼓勵博士班的學生上 Goldman Sachs 和 Economist 等重要刊物之網站,閱讀新資料,以直接瞭解現象推陳出新 之脈動。而政治學界,特別是關心實質政策內涵變化的公共行政和政策學界,也 應該以綜觀全球縱時性發展之宏觀思維來檢討自身學術理論發展之價值。否則, 被淘汰了還不自知。以 Phillip C. Schmitter 在 1970 年代中期提出的 Corporatism 理論為例,喧騰一時,其實是當時美國經濟 stagflation 之下的產物。當美國進入 「新經濟」階段之後,統合主義的說法便煙消雲散,Schmitter 只能以口號式的 long live Corporatism 來自我排解。國內學界要能看到西方理論發展上的連續性和 破綻,並找到自己的發聲位置,才可能建立自身的學術主體性。願本組師生,共 勉之!

4. Karl Polanyi, 1944. The Great Transformation: Economic Origins of Our Time. 3

5. he Political and Klingner, D. E. and Nalbandian, J. Public Personnel Management: Contexts and Strategies. 2003. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 4

6. Lewis, C. W. and Gilman, S. C. 2005. The Ethics Challenge in Public Service. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 4

7. Long, N. 1949. Power and Administration. 2

8. Maslow, 1943. A Theory of Human Motivation. 2

9. Meier, Kenneth J. and John Bohte, 2006. Politics and the Bureaucracy, Wadsworth Publishing. 1 1

10. Mosher, F. C. 1971. The Public Service in the Temporary Society. 2

11. Olsen, M. 1963. The Logic of Collective Action. 2

12. Ostrom, V. 1989 The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration,2nd ed,University of Alabama Press. 1

13. Peterson and John Rowan 1995, Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research, John Wiley & Sons. 3 該書過去是南加大公共行政研究所等學術重鎮的方法論基礎教材,對於人文社會 科學的哲學基礎和方法論觀點有廣泛的介紹,並提供了重要的研究案例。故為後 行為主義時代彌補實證科學方法論不足的重要著作。該書從 1981-1994 每年都有 再版,其後可能因詮釋學方法論和後現代理論的興起,不再有頻繁之再版。然而, 在政治學界而言,詮釋科學方法論還缺乏深刻而周全的引介。以 David Marsh 和 Gerry Stoker 兩人在 2002 年所作之 Theory and Methods in Political Science(中譯 2007 版《政治學方法論與途經》韋伯文化)為例,有介紹詮釋學之專章,卻未 清楚的接上胡賽爾現象學的源頭,故顯得支離散漫,變成對後現代主義泛泛之論 的介紹,徒使學子覺得大而無當。本人期待,三、五年之內政治學界會整合出比 較好的詮釋科學方法論教材。然而在此之前,Human Inquiry 一書還是有其不可 忽視的重要性,因為該書對於公共行政和公共政策所關懷的實質政策內容,提供 了寬闊的認識論和方法論基礎。

14. Randall B. Ripley 1985, Policy Analysis in Political Science, Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers. 3 可以算是後行為主義的代表性著作,將公共政策和政治學的關係作了很好的連 接,對於 policy process 尤其作了重要的歸納,成為政治學的基本概念。 3

15. Shafritz, J., A. C. Hide, and S. J. Parkes. (eds)., 2004. Classics of Public Administration. USA: Thomson Wadsworth. 4

16. Simon, Herbert. 1997. Administrative Behavior. 5th edition. NY: Free Press. 1

17. Thomas R. Dye 2007 12th edition, Understanding Public Policy, Pearson: Practice Hall. 3 該書對於公共政策的基本定義,擺脫了早期政治學理性主義的侷限,在政策內容 方面有相當充實扼要的介紹。此書是理想的大學部公共政策教材,然有大學同學 畢竟難以全部吸收,作為博士班必讀物,可對公共政策概念和內容有相當完整的 掌握。

18. Waldo.D, 1980. The Enterprise of Public Administration,Chandler & Sharp. 1

19. Wildavsky, Aaron. and Naomi Caiden. 2003. The New Politics of Budgetary Process Longman Classic Series. 1

 

|回到頁首 |